Oct
31

2013

Why women feel ‘stigmatised’ for not having children



New research suggests that many women aged 35-45 who do not have children feel judged for not having had a baby.

Even if they plan to have a child, nearly 60% have at some point felt stigmatised for leaving it late.

About 40% are too embarrassed to talk about fertility, especially with family and friends, often the biggest source of pressure.

Susan Seenan from Infertility Network UK says this prevents some women from seeking help for fertility problems.

The organisation, which interviewed 500 women for its survey, said it was a common problem.

“Trying for a baby is a very personal thing which people don’t always want to talk about, but there is constant pressure from families saying ‘Isn’t it about time…?’,” said Ms Seenan.

“And if you don’t say anything, then friends and family assume you like your lifestyle too much to be bothered about children.”

If women are then diagnosed with fertility problems, the sense of isolation can become even worse, she says.

“Unfortunately, infertility is still a taboo subject. When women are labelled as infertile they feel a failure, because they have let themselves and their partner down.

“Their basic biological instinct to have a child is kicking in – and at that point everyone seems to have babies, but they can’t.”

Ms Seenan suggests that for women in this position, it is easier to talk about mental health problems than infertility problems, which is the reason behind the forthcoming National Infertility Awareness Week.

Hurtful

Neela Prabhu, 36, from London, knows how hard it is to spend years trying to become pregnant. She and her husband tried for over a year before seeking help, and that took its toll on them both.

“My mental state at the time wasn’t great and although some friends tried to be well-meaning, they kept saying unfunny things about our situation. They were trying to be helpful but sometimes it just hurt. All I could think about was having a baby.”

in_vitro_fertilization-spl

The success of IVF depends on a woman’s age

Neela’s parents are from India and are very supportive, but she says her mother couldn’t relate to her problems, partly because it is an issue rarely discussed in Asian communities.

She says she wants this to change.

“I want there to be more openness. I want women to talk about infertility even if they are dying inside, and I want to give women the confidence to talk about the journey of having a child.

“But it just seems to be a taboo subject – why should this be?”

Neela finally had a daughter four years ago after IVF and has recently discovered she is pregnant again with her second baby, following two failed cycles of IVF last year. She has never found out the cause of her fertility problems despite numerous investigations.

Neela started trying for a baby at 27, but many women leave it much later and by doing so they decrease their chances of conceiving naturally and risk missing out on treatment under the NHS.

‘Fallback solution’

Current guidelines recommend that women up to 39 should be offered three full cycles of IVF and women aged between 40 and 42 should have access to one cycle.

But there are huge variations in criteria across the UK. In Oxford, for example, 35 is the limit for IVF treatment on the NHS.

Many couples try for years before seeking help and before they know it they are in their late 30s – and in some areas that’s too old.”

Tim Child Oxford Fertility Unit.

Tim Child, medical director at the Oxford Fertility Unit at the University of Oxford says people are leaving it too long before before going to see their GP about their fertility problems.

“When couples start talking about their fertility, that’s the point to speak to a healthcare professional.

“Good advice can be given early on about weight, diet, alcohol intake etc which could help, but many couples try for years before seeking help and before they know it they are in their late 30s – and in some areas that’s too old.”

He says that women wrongly assume that IVF is a good fallback solution when in fact the success rates are 40-50% for the under-35s, dropping to 20% for the under-40s and just 5% for women aged up to 43.

Neela hopes that people can be more understanding and supportive towards women “who can’t just fall off a log and get pregnant” so that people like her can feel more comfortable talking about it.

Instead of asking personal, intrusive questions, she wants people to be aware that one in seven heterosexual couples in the UK is affected by infertility.

Being judged has made Neela speak out.

“People used to ask me, ‘Don’t you want another child?’ It’s really nobody’s business but mine.”

National Infertility Awareness Week runs from 28 October.



Author:

Covering international news, feminist and politic issues and everything else that catches the panda's eye.

  • umvtogether

    The message here is right that it would be much better for people to talk about fertility issues in their own way. Especially, they can be a better parent when they have that IVF child because they are stress free.

    As a fellow South Asian, there is a lot I share in common with the author and hope to see a lot of progress on multiple fronts when tackling social justice issues.

  • Dee Ishani

    There’s a huge chunk of this story missing which actually means that we’re still not discussing the issue. Trying for a baby for one year isn’t actually very long to try. But it took her 5 years to have a child. IVF is a solution/option for couples under certain circumstances. But the interview/article does not address these at all. If we’re going to talk about it then let’s talk about the whole process – not just bits of it. And definitely don’t miss out the defining part.

    • umvtogether

      It would be nice if you can share what the “whole process” is for you. I think each journey of infertility or dysfertility is unique in its own way…some find a solution, some don’t. The more we share the more we can help each other.

      • D I

        I can only go by the experience of friends myself so I have nothing to share from personal experience. My point is that if we’re going to demystify and share then there shouldn’t be 4 years missing in a story.

        The advice doctor’s have given my friends (and the advice my from midwife friend) is that 18months-2 years is the average time to get pregnant. But this isn’t widely discussed in itself so people start to panic when it takes more than a few months. This causes stress which makes it harder to get pregnant. And don’t underestimate the power of this stress – I have a cousin who tried absolutely everything and in the end decided to proceed with adoption as it was the only option. She subsequently fell pregnant – naturally – with twins. Now, this is clearly unusual.

        But, bearing this in mind, the article implies that after 1 year of trying it’s necessary to turn to IVF when this isn’t the case at all. I have several friends with children. Some who got pregnant quickly (these were unplanned) and the rest took at least a year of trying – all fell pregnant naturally. One is still trying and it has been a very, very traumatic process for her but IVF is not an option for her.

        I do think that families can exacerbate the problem but we can’t change them – we can initiate the conversation ourselves with them. Otherwise we have to ignore them – easier said than done I know.

        • umvtogether

          While IVF may not be the first choice for everyone (especially straight couples), for single parents, gays, lesbians, intersex, one can only have a child either through adoption or IVF – it is very clear. They can move forward accordingly.

          • D I

            One may pursue those two options but they are no more definite options than the natural route. You may be turned down for either and/or they may not work out (especially the latter). It’s not that you ‘can’ do either of them at will.

            But that’s not my point. If we’re going to discuss this openly you cannot exclude the part of the story where the decision making was done. Was IVF first choice? That’s what I’m getting at. The article says that she started trying for a child at 27, trying unsuccessfully for a year and then fast forwards to her having a child at 32. This is not a complete and open discussion. That’s all I’m really trying to say.

          • umvtogether

            I see your point and yes there is a “gray area” in each case as to when the decision is made. And whether IVF is their first choice or not. For some people, the choice is clear – its either IVF or adoption or no child. For others, the unknown of trying causes undue stress which is counter-productive in some cases.

  • Pingback: Women stay with their hair stylists longer than their husbands | Pandagon

  • Pingback: Twice as many childless women in the UK | Pandagon

%d bloggers like this: